About MEJ

The Purpose of the Minnesota English Journal

MEJ offers expansive and interactive features, both for readers and writers, improving communication, inclusiveness, and community connectedness.

Prior to April 2014, the Minnesota Council of Teachers of English published MEJ once a year as a peer-reviewed collection of papers driven by pedagogy, theory, and research. After publication, each journal remained static, cemented in time, often relegated to the bookshelf. Writers rarely, if ever, received feedback, because readers were unable to participate in the discussion of topics broached in articles.

To keep pace with technology and the changing landscape of our professions, MEJ must effectively mirror the needs and preferences of the organization and show prospective members of MCTE will have much to gain by reading, contributing to, and interacting with MEJ.

Based upon the above discussions, we have decided upon the following priorities:

  1. Continue to peer-review longer, scholarly researched papers on theory and praxis; it is important for us to fulfill this service for the entire organization.
  2. Request teachers at all levels to share best practice and classroom narratives.
  3. Request teachers at all levels to share the means by which they assess their students’ progress, including interventions and strategies.
  4. Encourage short or long experiential articles on how to teach online effectively.
  5. Encourage short or long experiential articles on using technology to improve teaching, research, and writing.
  6. Encourage short or long experiential articles, driven or not by theory, on collaborative writing and collaborations among teachers.
  7. Encourage written efforts, short or long, by instructors (alone or in collaboration with others) engaged in the development of a culture of writing in their schools.
  8. Encourage opinion or issue-driven pieces of current interest to the profession.

To do any or all of these things effectively requires reciprocal communication between writers and readers. Therefore, every piece of writing in MEJ will include a COMMENT FUNCTION. Our publication will be a LIVING JOURNAL—one that grows and is enriched by the comments it records.  Each writer’s work will have a REAL AND LIVING AUDIENCE: one that expresses common interest in a piece, offers suggestions for its application, disagrees with its major premises while offering some emendations, and (perhaps most importantly) indicates that the piece has been read and shared. These priorities cannot succeed without YOUR active engagement—whether by submitting work that you truly care about (whatever length and shape and subject) and by your determination to engage an interactive community of teachers of writing and language and literature.

Please refer to the “CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS” for more details on contributing to MEJ. Do not hesitate to contact us should you need further information.

Welcome to MEJ. It’s yours.

History of MEJ

We’re working to construct a history of the journal, so if you have any memories or thoughts please do comment or pass them on.  Bill Dyer has outlined the mission of the journal in its current incarnation here, but we’d also like to build this page to explore and recount the MEJ’s history.

1965—the first MEJ is published.
1967—expanded and a unique focus for each issue
1983—cash prizes for featured essays (short lived)
2004—published online in PDF format
2010—became more of a peer-reviewed journal
2014—MEJ moved online in WordPress format
2015—created Facebook and Twitter pages

List of editors:
Burke Scarbrough (2017-)
Scott Hall (2014-2017)
Michael MacBride (2014-2016)
Brian C. Lewis (2011-2013)
John Banschbach (2004-2009)
Bill Dyer (2004-2009)
Jake Oetting (2000-2001)
Gwen Griffin ()
Gayle Gaskill (1994-1995)
John Schifsky (1990-1992)
Nancy Lund (1990-1992)
Elmer Suderman ()

5 Comments

  1. I am also looking for an article in an older version of MEJ. Where can we go to access the old articles.

    1. Thanks for your question, Heather. We are working on this. Issues of MEJ prior to our fully online presence have been housed in one place and then another as our web presence has evolved. We haven’t been able to recover and post those older issues so far. Check back later this spring, and I apologize for the gap in access.

  2. I’m trying to access an article from 2007 by Peter Henry called “The case against standardized testing” but the original link is now down and I didn’t save the PDF. Are older articles archived somewhere on the site?

Leave a Reply to johnnyincision Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s